Study protocol: evaluation of the 0-5 public health investment in England - a mixed-methods study integrating analyses of national linked administrative data with in-depth case studies.

INTRODUCTION: Health visiting is a long-established, nationally implemented programme that works with other services at a local level to improve the health and well-being of children and families. To maximise the impact and efficiency of the health visiting programme, policy-makers and commissioners need robust evidence on the costs and benefits of different levels and types of health visiting, for different families, in different local contexts. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This mixed-methods study will analyse individual-level health visiting data for 2018/2019 and 2019/2020 linked with longitudinal data from children's social care, hospitals and schools to estimate the association of number and type of health visiting contacts with a range of children and maternal outcomes. We will also use aggregate local authority data to estimate the association between local models of health visiting and area-level outcomes. Outcomes will include hospitalisations, breast feeding, vaccination, childhood obesity and maternal mental health. Where possible, outcomes will be valued in monetary terms, and we will compare total costs to total benefits of different health visiting service delivery models. Qualitative case studies and extensive stakeholder input will help explain the quantitative analyses and interpret the results in the context of local policy, practice and circumstance. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The University College London Research Ethics Committee approved this study (ref 20561/002). Results will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal and findings will be shared and debated with national policy-makers, commissioners and managers of health visiting services, health visitors and parents.

Seroconversion to mRNA SARS-CoV-2 Vaccines in Hematologic Patients.

Hematologic patients show lower responses to SARS-CoV-2 vaccines, but predictors of seroconversion are lacking. In this prospective cohort study, hematologic patients undergoing SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination at a single center in Milan, Italy, were sampled for anti-Spike and anti-Nucleocapsid IgG titer at 5 ± 1 weeks and at 3 months from the second vaccine dose. Patients (N = 393) received either BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech, 48%) or MRNA-1273 (Moderna, 52%), and 284 (72%) seroconverted and 100% persisted at 3 months. Non-response was higher in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and lymphoma patients, and in those treated with small molecules and monoclonal antibodies. In myeloid neoplasms, lower responses were detected in patients with acute myeloid leukemia treated with venetoclax plus hypomethylating agents and in patients with myelofibrosis receiving ruxolitinib. Multivariable analysis showed that seroconversion was favorably associated with a diagnosis other than indolent lymphoma/CLL [OR 8.5 (95% CI 4.1-17.6)], lack of B-cell-depleting therapy [OR 3.15 (1.7-5.9)], and IgG levels within the normal range [OR 2.2 (1.2-4.2)]. We developed a simple algorithm according to these 3 risk factors [(A) diagnosis of indolent lymphoma/CLL, (B) B-cell-depleting treatment, and (C) low IgG] to predict non-response. IgG levels and treatment may be modifiable risk factors and should be considered for timing of vaccine administration.

Voices from the frontline: findings from a thematic analysis of a rapid online global survey of maternal and newborn health professionals facing the COVID-19 pandemic.

INTRODUCTION: The COVID-19 pandemic has substantially impacted maternity care provision worldwide. Studies based on modelling estimated large indirect effects of the pandemic on services and health outcomes. The objective of this study was to prospectively document experiences of frontline maternal and newborn healthcare providers. METHODS: We conducted a global, cross-sectional study of maternal and newborn health professionals via an online survey disseminated through professional networks and social media in 12 languages. Information was collected between 24 March and 10 April 2020 on respondents' background, preparedness for and response to COVID-19 and their experience during the pandemic. An optional module sought information on adaptations to 17 care processes. Descriptive statistics and qualitative thematic analysis were used to analyse responses, disaggregating by low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs) and high-income countries (HICs). RESULTS: We analysed responses from 714 maternal and newborn health professionals. Only one-third received training on COVID-19 from their health facility and nearly all searched for information themselves. Half of respondents in LMICs received updated guidelines for care provision compared with 82% in HICs. Overall, 47% of participants in LMICs and 69% in HICs felt mostly or completely knowledgeable in how to care for COVID-19 maternity patients. Facility-level responses to COVID-19 (signage, screening, testing and isolation rooms) were more common in HICs than LMICs. Globally, 90% of respondents reported somewhat or substantially higher levels of stress. There was a widespread perception of reduced use of routine maternity care services, and of modification in care processes, some of which were not evidence-based practices. CONCLUSIONS: Substantial knowledge gaps exist in guidance on management of maternity cases with or without COVID-19. Formal information-sharing channels for providers must be established and mental health support provided. Surveys of maternity care providers can help track the situation, capture innovations and support rapid development of effective responses.